PRP and cell-based methods both use the patient’s own tissue, but they are different procedures with different levels of evidence. How they differ and how to choose.
What is PRP?
PRP (platelet-rich plasma) is obtained from 10–60 ml of the patient’s blood by centrifugation. Platelets release growth factors that reduce inflammation and may support tissue healing. The procedure takes about an hour and is done as an outpatient.
What are cell-based methods?
They include bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) and the stromal vascular fraction. They are obtained by bone marrow aspiration or mini-liposuction, so the procedure is more complex and more expensive. CGF is a blood-derived concentrate similar to PRP.
Comparison
| PRP | Cell-based methods (BMAC, MFAT) | |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest | Blood from a vein | Bone marrow aspiration or mini-liposuction |
| Evidence | Largest: knee osteoarthritis, tennis elbow | Small studies, mixed results |
| Effect on cartilage | Cartilage restoration not proven | Cartilage restoration not proven |
| Usual duration of effect | Several months, longer in some patients | Individual, little data |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
What the research says
In knee osteoarthritis, PRP reduced pain more than hyaluronic acid in several studies, although in the large RESTORE trial it did not outperform placebo. For cell-based methods there is no evidence yet that they work better than PRP. Neither method grows new cartilage.
Why image guidance matters
An injection under ultrasound or X-ray guidance is more accurate than a “blind” one, especially into the hip and the spine.
How to choose
The clinic physician chooses the method based on the diagnosis, stage, previous treatment and your goals. We send your images to several clinics, and you compare their offers and prices. More in the PRP vs SVF comparison.

